- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:18:06 +0200
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-webapi <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:20:37 +0200, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Would others accept changing the methods to cssQuery() and > cssQueryOne()? If this would achieve concensus, I'd be willing to use > these names. Opera does not like the cssQuery names and prefers the names that were suggested in Lachy's draft. I recall strong objection to names which suggested this was about CSS in the past (but maybe it was only Anne objecting) on the basis that this isn't about CSS but selectors. So, Bjoern, Maciej, do you object to closing the issue with the names Lachy proposed in his draft, or are you just tossing in another idea in case it gets stronger consensus? cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 09:19:04 UTC