- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:07:05 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> > wrote: > > > FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and > > > 'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these > > > events should be namespaced, please let me know. > > > > This is fine with me so long as 'bindings-are-ready' is renamed to > > 'xbl-bindings-are-ready'. Having two XBL-specific events where only > > one starts with 'xbl-' is rather confusing, and I don't see how the > > second event neither is XBL-specific nor should be XBL-specific. > > Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having > "bindings-are-ready" and "bound"? 'bound' on its own is too vague. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 04:48:52 UTC