- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:15:32 +0100
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:07:05 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >> FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and >> 'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these >> events should be namespaced, please let me know. > > This is fine with me so long as 'bindings-are-ready' is renamed to > 'xbl-bindings-are-ready'. Having two XBL-specific events where only > one starts with 'xbl-' is rather confusing, and I don't see how the > second event neither is XBL-specific nor should be XBL-specific. Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having "bindings-are-ready" and "bound"? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 14:15:55 UTC