- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:47:37 +0100
- To: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <ap-carbon@rambler.ru>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:04:09 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap-carbon@rambler.ru> wrote: > It is not really obvious to me why this is even desirable - isn't it > easier to serve as XHTML in cases when responseXML is needed? After all, > XMLHttpRequest is not a general purpose HTTP library, so we don't need to > worry about arbitrary content. I think it actually is a general purpose HTTP library, despite the name. (For ECMAScript anyway.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 10:48:02 UTC