- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:15:02 +0200
- To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:45:36 +0200, liorean <liorean@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd prefer a custom interface to that one, if using ES4 ByteArray > straight off is not an > option - though ES4 ByteArray should be implementable in ES3 engines, > so inventing a custom interface instead of backporting the ES4 one is > just adding cruft in my opinion. Based on this and similar comments in this thread I've used ByteArray. I haven't yet added any appropriate references to ES4 definitions. I suppose implementors will know where to find them meanwhile and once the specification is ready the binding specification will have addressed it in one way or another... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 13:15:16 UTC