- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:42:18 +0200
- To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Subbu Allamaraju <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com>
Anne van Kesteren schrieb: > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:52:50 +0200, Subbu Allamaraju > <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com> wrote: >> I find a bit odd for the XMLHttpRequest draft to require all >> implementations to support the listed method names. In particular, >> what the motivation for the conformance statement - >> >> [...] > > In recent editor drafts this has been changed to GET, POST, PUT, DELETE > and HEAD. All others should be supported, but are not explicitly listed. I'd like to add that one of the reasons for talking about this at all is to *prevent* people from only supporting GET/HEAD/POST .-)
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 13:42:55 UTC