- From: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:52:50 -0600
- To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 22:52:58 UTC
I find a bit odd for the XMLHttpRequest draft to require all implementations to support the listed method names. In particular, what the motivation for the conformance statement - "User agents *must* at least support the following list of methods (see [ RFC2616 <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#RFC2616>], [RFC2518<http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#ref-rfc2518>], [RFC3253 <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#ref-rfc3253>], [RFC3648<http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#ref-rfc3648>] and [RFC3744 <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#ref-rfc3744>])" The method list should be an implementation choce. Moreover, the current language does not allow special purpose implementations, say, to want to support only GET and POST. Subbu -- ------------------------------ http://www.subbu.org
Received on Monday, 9 October 2006 22:52:58 UTC