- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:23:43 +0200
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:15:12 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: >>> [[[ >>> Clearly identify the class of products (i.e., type of products or >>> services) upon which the requirements are imposed. If multiple >>> classes of products are targeted by the specification, make sure each >>> is described. Examples of classes of products include: content, >>> producer of content, player, protocol, API, agent, and guidelines. >>> ]]] - http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#implement-principle >>> >>> >>> It might be important for the Conformance section at a latter stage >>> and for the Test suite. >> >> I believe this is a duplicate of a comment http://www.w3.org/mid/ >> 63158BD4-C561-48D7-A801-1DAF64994BE6@w3.org you e-mailed just a bit >> earlier about our conformance model. I have not yet addressed that >> comment as I haven't specified the classes of products yet. If this is >> not a duplicate of that comment, please elaborate. > > It is related yet. Defining the class of products is very important to > write the specifications, more than the other way around. It should be > done at the start. In the Introduction it helps also to remind the scope > of the specification. > > So there's a need for the Conformance Section and a need for the Scope > section. I tend to agree, but both of your comments where about the missing classes of products in the Conformance section. ;-) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 11:23:51 UTC