- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:27 +0200
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:30:50 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > I'm wondering if it would be useful to have some optional flags in > implementations that developers can use to test for. While many JS > features can be tested for by testing a property, this isn't so for XHR; > e.g., you can't easily test to see if it supports more than GET and > POST, for example, or if the cache is correctly implemented. > > [...] hasFeature() didn't work out, this won't work out either. Basically most versioning proposals don't work out :-) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 11:32:45 UTC