- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:36:11 +0100
- To: "Sergey Ilinsky" <sergey@backbase.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:25:38 +0100, Sergey Ilinsky <sergey@backbase.com> wrote: > Why do you think the specifyed in DOM-Events module processing model > should be changed? I think the existing behaviour where capture-type > listeners are not being processed on the target fits the entire set > of requirements that could be met. Right, this issue was raised because there is at least one implementation that does not do what the specification currently states. That an issue is being raised does not mean there is consensus within the group to actually change the behavior that is specified. It just means that we should probably look into it given that it's a valid issue. Personally I'm also in favor of keeping the behavior specified on DOM Level 2 Events. Making it a bit clearer in DOM Level 3 Events can't hurt I guess given that it has apparently caused some confusion with implementors. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 11:36:23 UTC