- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:31:00 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Wed, 31 May 2006 00:11:23 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >>> I'm not in love with having "match" in the name, but I could live >>> with matchAll() and matchOne(). >> >> I like these names. Having short names is nice and all, but having >> clear ones is even better. Especially when the extra cost is just >> another three letters to type. > > I'm not really fond of matchOne()... Is there any precedence on this? Don't know. But i'm not sure there is any precedence of having the un-postfixed method (in this case 'match') just return the first entry either. Usually the base method returns the full result and there are prefixed/postfixed methods that just return part of it. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 5 June 2006 19:31:35 UTC