- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:51:38 +0200
- To: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
- Cc: Carvalho Melvin <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "noloader@gmail.com" <noloader@gmail.com>, "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>
On 2015-10-12 13:53, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: <snip> > > Anders can you please try to be more positive and constructive about your posts. I consider it constructive asking prospective members of pre-announced WGs to provide input specifications *before* actually starting in order to not repeat the problems we saw in: http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/webcrypto-next-workshop I believe Ryan Sleevi have said something similar as well. > > Is it not obvious here that one can use a Shim, and that older browsers never are > retrofittted with newer standards? IE 11 is Microsoft's most recent browser for their currently largest installed base of Windows. Why does it still require a workaround? Probably because there's limited demand for WebCrypto. > > I agree with Tony that this looks very much like trolling, much like many > of your posts to the WebID Community Group [1]. My postings in the WebID CG has only been about HTTPS Client Cert Authentication used by WebID-TLS. You need no particular knowledge of linked data and RDF on *that* level. Anyway, as we know, HTTPS Client Certificate Authentication is slowly but surely leaving the browser world (Microsoft "Edge" already removed web-enrollment), so these discussions are only of historical interest. Anders
Received on Monday, 12 October 2015 12:52:13 UTC