- From: gaz Heyes <gazheyes@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:47:06 +0000
- To: Lucas Adamski <ladamski@mozilla.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Security Interest Group <public-web-security@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 20:47:38 UTC
On 4 February 2011 20:27, Lucas Adamski <ladamski@mozilla.com> wrote: > My specific concern with JSON is that its a data format that is simply a > child of its environment: JavaScript. Its purpose is to escape data in such > a way as to be reliably transmitted within, and parse by, JavaScript. > Neither of those hold true inside an HTTP header. > > Can you provide some specific examples where the JSON format is "better" > (more compact, more expressive) than the current proposal? > Actually I changed my mind and suggested any format in uncompressed form and then compiling into a smaller compressed form applied inside the http header so now the actual format you write in doesn't matter as long as it compiles into the compressed format.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 20:47:38 UTC