On 4 February 2011 12:31, gaz Heyes <gazheyes@gmail.com> wrote:
> The trouble is the method of sending a policy is conflicting with the
> usability of implementing it. I know why it's being sent via http headers..
> speed. Because of that it will have to be compressed but what is the bloody
> point of having a nice fast policy if nobody uses it apart from Facebook?
> How about a compromise between a lighter policy syntax within HTTP headers
> with a option to specify a policy link which has a more familiar syntax like
> CSS/JSON?
>
Actually I have a better idea, a compiler. Write the policy in CSS/JSON,
verify it then it compiles into a compact http header that is very
lightweight.