- From: Rui Carmo <rui.carmo@accao.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 19:48:08 +0100
- To: scott@xmlx.ca
- Cc: public-web-plugins@w3.org
On Sábado, Ago 30, 2003, at 17:53 Europe/Lisbon, Scott Cadillac wrote: > > Interesting musings Rui, Thanks, but my musings are not the point here. It's just a collection of links I found while analysing the issues and a first step at gauging the impact on web designers, usability, and standartization. > Please express yourself, but don't call this a comprehensive summary > while > editorializing your opinion at the same time. I was not (at all) referring to my musings as a comprehensive summary on the issues this list was created to debate. If you take the time to re-read my original posting, you will see that they are only what lack of information (most notably the lack of the aforesaid summary) led me to reflect on. Allow me also to make clear that I'm not an editor of anything, merely someone trying to figure out what the actual situation is and coming up blank, because: 1) It is not clear whether the court ruling has impact on ActiveX, the (originally Netscape, I think) plugin architecture (and hence Flash) or applets. 2) We do not know the alternatives Microsoft presented to the W3C (and are hence unable to gauge the impact of any of them) 3) We have yet to find a statement from Eolas where it is clear whether they will (or won't) consider suing any other browser developers (which might affect Mozilla, Safari, Opera, etc.) > This issue affects so many of us in so many different ways, that I > think the > only way to get through this is to focus on the technical issues > objectively. I second that. But as someone else posted earlier, we can't focus on technical issues without knowing more. As far as we know, there is not single compilation of legal issues, technical issues, or alternatives. There are also very few statements on the issue (being Saturday, that's understandable...). Maybe someone at the W3C (given its neutrality), could start compiling a FAQ on this? > The case for standardization and conformity for public websites is one > thing, but I'm a private Intranet developer and I'm more interested in > the > impact on the business solutions I provide with MSIE. I can understand that perfectly, but despite the (predictable) brouhaha from the Open Source community given this (and I quote) "blow to Microsoft's dominance", this does not seem to affect only MSIE. They were just the best target. > Right now we are all short on technical details and some time-frame > for the > changes. > > Thank you for your links, some of these look very interesting. > Cheers.... I recommend perusing the Eolas news page (people wanting to skip my rants can go directly to it): http://www.eolas.com/news.html - it is short on scope and specifics, but maybe someone can glean useful information from the postings (some require subscriptions to the online newspaper editions, which I don't have). Regards, Rui Carmo http://mac.against.org
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2003 14:48:12 UTC