- From: Craig Babcock <craig@alldat.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:30:04 -0700
- To: <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
Aral, As a Flash programmer, I certainly share your concerns. I am curious where precisely the line is drawn on the 'plugin' issue. Are browser plugins themselves an infringement of the patent, or is the scope of the patent limited to the process of using embedded objects in 'hypermedia' documents to control browser plugins? Will it be possible to skirt the issue by linking directly to .SWF docs? How will this effect traditional client-side applications that support OLE embedded objects, i.e. most of Microsoft Office? Perhaps the most distressing of all eOLAS' claims (that I have yet to see addressed), is the "invention" of remote computing - basically any program running on a networked computer being controlled by another computer on the network. This could have a devastating effect on distributed/web-based computing. Also, eOLAS holds a patent on the use of images/colors/pixels to access or navigate information and claims "The patent also covers image space collision detection technology believed to be currently in widespread use throughout the computer game industry." I guess the question is who they will sue next? Craig Babcock Alldat Corporation 206.854.3844
Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 17:34:44 UTC