- From: Tobie Langel <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:43:19 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
> However, it is a little different from the coverage tool, that you proposed 4 tests per RFC2119 key word ('must' and 'should') by default :)
Hehe. Good catch. :)
Let's seek to get consensus on this in the mailing list[3] and apply the decision consistently. My personal preference would be to mark optional tests with meta-data but still include them in the repo.
---
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2013JulSep/0240.html
View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/306#discussion_r6505515
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2013 15:43:25 UTC