Hi Ian TBH I prefer to avoid calendar meetings for tasks that can be done asynchronously. I started going over the LCP issues myself to see if I have input, I didn't know it required triage. If other folks prefer a synchronized triage these timings are OK with me, I think biweekly is more than enough. Note that I'm on leave for the next 4 weeks though, but I can try to join if there is an opportunity, or respond to issues asynchronously. On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:41 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com> wrote: > Thanks Ian!! > Are you planning for this to be a weekly call or a bi-weekly one? > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 5:18 PM Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com> wrote: > >> Hey WebPerf Folks! >> >> I'm setting up a recurring meeting to triage all of the outstanding >> WebPerf spec issues (and there are a bunch) -- to make sure that we are >> making progress on old issues, and not letting new ones go unnoticed. >> >> I'm expecting it to be a pretty dry, functional meeting, so I'm >> explicitly just inviting a few people, but anyone's welcome to attend. >> >> Tentatively scheduling this to replace a previous triage meeting; Mondays >> at 11:00 ET, 08:00 PT, 15:00 UTC. I'm really open to changing that around >> as needed, though. >> >> I figure that we can start by tackling some of the bigger repos first -- >> Reporting has ~40 outstanding issues, LCP has ~25, and we can work our way >> down from there. >> >> If people are agreeable to the times, I'll send out a calendar invite, >> and hopefully see folks next week! >> >> Ian >> >
Received on Friday, 13 May 2022 05:28:22 UTC