W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > April 2021

Re: Resource Timing L1's future

From: Benjamin De Kosnik <bdekoz@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:03:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEHQyn1g1mgs=4CRg=R74+g-aokWb=hyrXmOkjnRfjdwNhtsEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com>
Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Nic Jansma <nic@nicj.net>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
> Would you and your organization find the publishing of Resource Timing L1
to REC useful?


Not really: not the best use of our time. Let's just publish the L2 and
move more stuff to the Living Standard track.

-benjamin

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:51 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> We’d like to get the group’s consensus on the publishing of Resource
> Timing L1 <https://www.w3.org/TR/resource-timing-1/>.
>
> We never moved that specification beyond CR.
>
> One option would be to abandon it and only publish L2 as a CR Living
> Standard. Another would be to take L1 to REC.
>
> Given that the related discussion
> <https://w3c.github.io/web-performance/meetings/2021/2021-04-01/index.html>
> on the WG call showed no strong preference from folks attending, we wanted
> to get the broader group’s opinion on the importance of such publishing,
> and the level of effort we should invest in it happening.
>
> Would you and your organization find the publishing of Resource Timing L1
> to REC useful?
>
>
> Let us know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yoav & Nic
>
>
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2021 18:03:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 15 April 2021 18:03:45 UTC