On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:29 AM Benjamin De Kosnik <bdekoz@mozilla.com> wrote: > > >>> Mozilla is interested in prototyping layout instability, but is >>> concerned about the potential overhead in making this a part of a standard >>> and required for every page load. >>> >> >> Is the concern around implementation overhead, due to buffering? >> > > Implementation overhead, additional traversing of paint trees or marking > items, buffering, etc. We'll know soon enough, and then report back. > > >> To be clear, the CFC is about whether this is a draft the WG wants to >> adopt as a Working Draft, not whether this is e.g. ready to advance in the >> standards track beyond it. >> The question is, do we want the exploration to continue to happen in the >> WICG for now, or move to the WG? >> > > Seems like a great first topic for the next call. > Great, I'll add it then! :) > > best, > -benjamin >
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2020 04:34:58 UTC