Re: Is there any way to deal with streaming content?

firefox is doing support for server-timing in trailers. Its actually the
only trailer we will support. (so far.)

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Ilya Grigorik <>

> Hi Anton. Yes, and no..
> Server-Timing is communicated via an HTTP header field that, per spec, can
> either be present in the initial set of response headers before the
> response body, or as a trailer after the response. As such, one could, in
> theory, deliver a Server-Timing trailer *after* the full response body has
> been streamed, annotating the individual chunks — note that you can't
> interleave this data with the response itself.
> The one extra wrinkle here is that trailer support is still lacking:
> Chrome does not support it (yet, at least), and afaik Mozilla implemented
> partial support but it's not wired up fully for Server-Timing.
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Anton Nemtsev <>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> am I right and there are no way to transfer server-timings if you stream
>> content?
>> For example when I use renderToNodeStream
>> <> to
>> render html on server side?
>> Regards.

Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 16:20:46 UTC