I've added this fix to https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing/pull/27 which I
had forgotten about.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> wrote:
> Ah, nice catch! Thanks for reporting this.
>
> +Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com> fyi, a quick fix? :-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:22 AM 刘博文 <liubowen@360.cn> wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone.
>>
>> in the https://w3c.github.io/paint-timing/ draft , I found an error.
>>
>> In the 1.1. Usage example section, The last line of comment code is wrong.
>>
>> var observer = new PerformanceObserver(function(list) {
>> var perfEntries = list.getEntries();
>> for (var i = 0; i < perfEntries.length; i++) {
>> // Process entries // report back for analytics and monitoring // ... }});
>> // register observer for long task notificationsobserver.observe({entryTypes: ["paint"]});
>>
>>
>> The comment code should be changed to the following:
>>
>> var observer = new PerformanceObserver(function(list) {
>> var perfEntries = list.getEntries();
>> for (var i = 0; i < perfEntries.length; i++) {
>> // Process entries // report back for analytics and monitoring // ... }});
>> // register observer for paint timing notificationsobserver.observe({entryTypes: ["paint"]});
>>
>>
>>