- From: Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:48:14 -0800
- To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 03:48:57 UTC
Adding one more (time permitting): https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/24 On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> wrote: > Hangout: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/chromium.org/webperf-wg > > --- Agenda: > > - *Performance Timeline* > - Performance.timing shouldn't be deprecated > <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/68> > - Clarify disconnecting a PerformanceObserver that has observed > entries <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/66> > - Clarify sort order for entries with equivalent startTime > <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/67> > - Clarify how PerformanceObserver invokes the callback > <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/65> > > > - *Resource Timing* > - Clarify whether UA can clear the buffer under memory pressure > <https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/94> > - Increase limit of 150 for PerformanceEntrys? > <https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/89> > > - Long Tasks, Paint Timing: do we need to update WG charter? > - Long Tasks / Paint API v1 progress updates > - Beacon: test + Fetch integration updates > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 03:48:57 UTC