On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Eli Perelman <eperelman@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Has anything actionable come from this thread yet? I certainly find value
> in receiving events for performance entries and annotating them as well.
>
I think we reached rough consensus that it's a good idea... and we just
need to draft and land the spec update.
I've opened a tracking bug:
https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/1
ig
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com> wrote:
> >
> > For user timings, we're already using a wrapper as you mentioned.
> > However, I'd prefer to use the standard interface. Its also possible
> > for libraries outside my control to set new marks that I'd like to
> > report.
> >
> > New resource timing data is often outside of the user's control. New
> > images and scripts can be appended dynamically.
>