W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2014

RE: [agenda] teleconf 2014-11-12

From: Tobin Titus <tobint@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:46:51 +0000
To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6188530724364908bec082cc19c88863@BLUSR01MB603.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com>
I’ll add:

* Resource timing:
    Bugs were fixed by commits by jgraham in 4be57f4fe86c5ebe2b607d6f3e3948a59aa6cd03 
         (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/commit/4be57f4fe86c5ebe2b607d6f3e3948a59aa6cd03)
     - Use of innerText was removed to Fix #1256
        (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/1256)
     - Improper URL Prefixes were removed to Fix #1258 
        (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/1258)
     - Error reporting / tests were completely revamped to Fix #1267 
        (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/1267)

I'd like to make sure we agree these are fixed and we can close these issues.

Tobin


From: Ilya Grigorik [mailto:igrigorik@google.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:12 PM
To: public-web-perf
Subject: [agenda] teleconf 2014-11-12

Some items I'd like to get on the agenda for tomorrow's call:

* Performance Timeline: 
  - Clarify async behavior: https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/3 - feedback?

* Nav/Resource Timing:
  - nextHopProtocol: https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/pull/4 - feedback?
  - {transfer, encodedBody, decodedBody}Size
     * https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/pull/5#issuecomment-62228911

     * should we account for same origin redirect(s) HTTP overhead in transferSize?

* Resource Hints
  - Separate required and speculative semantics for rel=preload?
    * https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints/issues/15


* Server Timing: 
  - use cases, annotations, extensions to NT/RT vs. separate spec
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 00:47:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:01:26 UTC