Re: Broken link in navigation timing spec

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:25 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> The link at is 
> a broken link to 
> which is of course 404.

oops. That's an unfortunate side effect of the revamping of
and we were never able to set up proper redirects there so far.
At least the editor's version of Navigation Timing has the right link
but since the plan is to deprecate the entire draft, I'm sure if we'll
get around updating it.


Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 16:37:00 UTC