Re: [agenda] Web Performance WG Teleconference #125 Agenda 2014-02-12

That's great news!

I looked through the archives and the following comments are also
outstanding:

from Jonas:
"We should define though that any CORS errors during the response
should be ignored. If we do that, effectively the only effect of using
CORS is that cross-origin beacons that use a content-type other than
the ones above will require a preflight."

Should I add this to the spec? Could you suggest exact language?

Also is this thread fully resolved?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2014Jan/0003.html

Arvind



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> FWIW, we're almost done with our Beacon implementation. The two
> outstanding issues that I know of are:
>
> 1. Details of what "settings object" to use. My understanding is that
> we need to be more explicit about which document to use for things
> like referrer, cors origin and base-urls. Hopefully we can bring
> consistency across APIs like "new Image()", XMLHttpRequest, WebSocket
> and sendBeacon.
> 2. Should we allow beacons without a request body.
>
> Once we answer those questions, are we ready to move to LC?
>
> / Jonas
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Below is the proposed agenda for our conference call meeting tomorrow at
> 3PM
> > EST / 12PM PST. Feel free to propose additional topics to the agenda.
> >
> >
> >
> > Zakim Bridge Number:
> >
> > +1.617.761.6200 . For SIP access, see
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> >
> > Passcode 97373 (WPERF)
> >
> >
> > IRC channel #webperf on irc.w3.org:6665   http://irc.w3.org/
> >
> > Working Group Conference Call (3-4PM EST/12-1PM PST)
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Discuss Beacon
> >
> > 2. Discuss Navigation Error Logging
> >
> > 3. Discuss Resource Priorities
> >
> > 4. Other topics
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jatinder
>
>