Re: [Beacon] Required Beacon-Age: handling.

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Ilya Grigorik <> wrote:

> Yes, until there is a bug and some UA omits it by accident (or
> intentionally), at which point I'm back to UA detection: if X UA then no
> delay, if Y UA then I don't trust the timestamp... at which point, I guess
> I would need to move that detection into JS-land and pick the method that I
> trust.

Firefox appears to already ship sendBeacon without the Beacon-Age header
anyway. (I imagine their implementation predates the header.)

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 08:31:29 UTC