- From: Tobin Titus <tobint@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:24:59 +0000
- To: Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 17:25:29 UTC
Good thought here. Anyone have any more input or thoughts on this? Tobin From: Bruno Racineux [mailto:bruno@hexanet.net] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 1:18 PM To: Tobin Titus; public-web-perf Subject: Re: Closed: Action 130 Remove postpone from resource priorities On 4/17/14 12:02 PM, "Tobin Titus" <tobint@microsoft.com<mailto:tobint@microsoft.com>> wrote: Per agreement yesterday, postpone was removed from resource priorities: http://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/track/actions/130 The updated spec is here: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/ResourcePriorities/Overview.html -TT Accordingly. 'lazyload' should now be renamed 'postpone', 'delay' or something else. I am repeating from a previous thread, because that's important going forward. The 'lazyload' keyword semantic is a bad distortion of language or web/it jargon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Nov/0082.html i.e. Said 'lazyload does precisely what the definition of 'postpone' is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Nov/0087.html Thanks
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 17:25:29 UTC