Re: [ResourcePriorities] Scripts and integration with HTML spec

Hi Tobin,
Any update on this? We need to reply to Ian's questions in this thread:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Dec/0061.html

I believe we have consensus that eventually we'd like the concepts
introduced in Resource priorities to be part of HTML5 (HTML5.1?)
specification. So what is the plan of action? If we are going to continue
to first spec it in a separate document, please respond to Ian's questions.

Thanks,
Arvind


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Tobin Titus wrote:
> >
> > Resource Priorities is in the Web Performance Working Group charter. As
> > a working group, we have been making significant progress here and I
> > even have some more changes in flight per our last discussion. We have
> > all of the right performance people and browser vendors involved in the
> > conversation here and, while I was not there, I have the notes that show
> > this was discussed at TPAC extensively as well.  We want to have one
> > spec where we address the end-to-end problem. One we feel that our
> > solution addresses the performance issue, we can consider if it makes
> > sense to incorporate our fixes into the HTML 5.1 spec.
> >
> > That said, we should remain consistent so if there is a conflict with
> > <script> I am happy to resolve those conflicts in this spec.
> >
> > Ian, If you have use cases that we have not accounted for, particularly
> > those with script, please send them so I can incorporate them. As
> > always, you're more than welcome to work with us here in the Web
> > Performance Working Group.
>
> Oh. This seems to contradict what Arvind said.
>
> I'm fine either way. I just need to know what's going on. Until Arvind
> just replied yesterday, there had been no reply to my e-mail from
> December:
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Dec/0061.html
>
> If this group is going to continue its work on HTML, rather than it being
> done in the HTML spec, then we should go back to that e-mail and discuss
> the points I raised in there in more detail, so that I know how we're
> going to address them and so that we can more closely coordinate
> extensions.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
>