- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:03:50 -0500
- To: jamesr <jamesr@chromium.org>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
I put together the issues list for Timing control for script-based animations since we're moving it to CR: http://www.w3.org/2013/02/raf-issues.html 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2012Feb/0070.html I don't see a rational for not using a partial interface in the thread. Did we forget this one? 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2012Jul/0001.html "Should requestAnimationFrame tick on display:none iframes?" This one is linked to the issue I raised on October 10 regarding page visibility. As such, no clarification is needed (except in the CSS Working Group). Do we have a test for this btw? Not required for us to move to LC but would be good to have before moving to PR. 3. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Jan/0009.html I'm assuming this one is out of scope for this version at least. Unless someone else replies, I'll do so. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 00:12:33 UTC