On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> Btw, this came up again on the table during our f2f on Resource Timing
> L2 [1]. I added a note about it in our dashboard after that [2]. So,
> while we're not good at having a clear list of features we're
> considering for .next, this one is definitively in it. Now, I don't
> believe we considered it for Nav Timing yet.
>
I would love to see it in both -- can't think of any reason not to? Same
goes for protocol (http/1.1, http/2, spdy/3, etc).