- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 02:54:12 +0200
- To: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- CC: Kyle Simpson <getify@gmail.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Le 13/08/2013 02:36, James Robinson a écrit : > Here's a much simpler resolution for your dilemma: setImmediate() is > actually not a very good idea, so nobody has an incentive to implement > it and there's no dilemma at all. :-) Which part of setImmediate isn't a very good idea? One thing I'm sure of is that web authors want to be able to schedule subtasks that will run quickly. They've been hacking postMessage for that purpose or other the event system. Promises will have microtasks, etc. We already have some form of setImmediate and some other coming. Are these also bad ideas? David
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 00:54:42 UTC