- From: Matthias Jakel <matthiasjakel@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 19:12:38 +0200
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3AF14B75F8AC435E8FD1AF96D129E863@gmail.com>
ok. that makes sense. Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 um 19:05 schrieb Philippe Le Hegaret: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:05 +0200, Matthias Jakel wrote: > > i have read the resource timing draft and i suggest to add the > > "requestEnd" attribute to the PerformanceEntry interface to be able to > > calculate the time the server needs to respond with the first byte. If > > you use the chrome developer tools and use the network tab you can see > > the "waiting" time which you could calculate from requestEnd and > > responseStart attributes. without the requestEnd attribute calculating > > the waiting time seems not to be possible. > > > > > I believe the reason not to have it is similar to the reason we don't > have one in Navigation Timing: > [[ > This interface does not include an attribute to represent the completion > of sending the request, e.g., requestEnd. > > * Completion of sending the request from the user agent does not > always indicate the corresponding completion time in the network > transport, which brings most of the benefit of having such an > attribute. > * Some user agents have high cost to determine the actual > completion time of sending the request due to the HTTP layer > encapsulation. > ]] > http://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing/#sec-navigation-timing-interface > > Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 17:13:19 UTC