On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Right. That's all I had in mind there. I suppose, by this definite it >>> would also apply to Image(), which also seems fine to me. >> >> >> Actually, Image() creates an img element, so perhaps it already falls >> under the localName clause. >> >> On second thought, the current wording you have in the spec sounds good >> to me. I don't see a problem with using "script" as the initiatorType for >> XMLHttpRequests. No need to add any rules regarding JS constructor names. >> > > I don't like that. I think XHRs should show up as XHRs. It's going to be > useful for a website to collect timing info about XHRs and scripts > separately from each other by using getEntriesByInitiatorType(). > Oh, good point. Should we just special-case XHR?
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 18:14:26 UTC