On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Right. That's all I had in mind there. I suppose, by this definite it >> would also apply to Image(), which also seems fine to me. > > > Actually, Image() creates an img element, so perhaps it already falls > under the localName clause. > > On second thought, the current wording you have in the spec sounds good to > me. I don't see a problem with using "script" as the initiatorType for > XMLHttpRequests. No need to add any rules regarding JS constructor names. > I don't like that. I think XHRs should show up as XHRs. It's going to be useful for a website to collect timing info about XHRs and scripts separately from each other by using getEntriesByInitiatorType(). James
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 17:33:11 UTC