Re: [ResourceTiming] initiator types

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Right. That's all I had in mind there. I suppose, by this definite it
>> would also apply to Image(), which also seems fine to me.
>
>
> Actually, Image() creates an img element, so perhaps it already falls
> under the localName clause.
>
> On second thought, the current wording you have in the spec sounds good to
> me. I don't see a problem with using "script" as the initiatorType for
> XMLHttpRequests. No need to add any rules regarding JS constructor names.
>

I don't like that. I think XHRs should show up as XHRs. It's going to be
useful for a website to collect timing info about XHRs and scripts
separately from each other by using getEntriesByInitiatorType().

James

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 17:33:11 UTC