- From: James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:05:51 -0700
- To: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 18:06:23 UTC
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote: > I'm not clear on the final recommendation here. Are we saying that we will > add all navigation timing attributes (which as part of PerformanceTiming > interface) to PerformanceEntry interface (which would mean removing some > attributes from PerformanceResourceTiming interface)? > > Or would we create another object called PerformanceNavigationTiming > (similar to PerformanceResourceTiming) which extends from PerformanceEntry? > The latter. We'll create a new type with the extra members. James
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 18:06:23 UTC