Re: [PageVisibility] What should the visibility api return in display:none iframes?

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Shishir Agrawal <> wrote:
> If we want to include display none, why not consider other visibility cases
> - All of which would probably benefit web developers. I think the idea was
> to keep the page visibility consistent and simple.

Simpler for who? The web developer or the person implementing the spec?

So far no-one has been able to argue why this is better for the web
developer. As far as I can see it's strictly worse for them.

I'm certainly open to adding other visibility cases. Anne brought up
visibility:hidden which I would be ok with, though as I explained
there are arguments against it.

/ Jonas

Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 21:14:06 UTC