- From: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:12:42 +0000
- To: olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Ricardo Oliveira <rvelosoo@gmail.com>, public-web-perf@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 12:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>
>> On 11/16/11 10:33 PM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
>>>
>>> The Firefox implementation is passing 24% of the conformance tests at
>>> present
>>
>> For a lot of these, that's just because the tests are run inside an
>> <object>... We'll fix that, obviously, but that's not likely to be
>> affecting actual pages.
>
> Just curious, why are the tests running inside <object>? AFAIK using
> <object> for html pages isn't that common. Testing <iframe> would
> be more important (I'm not saying testing <object> isn't important).
TBH, I don't see any tests that run in an <object>. Nor does
document.getElementsByTagName('object') turn anything up on the tests
I sampled.
The sources along with revision history are here:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/file/dbf0cc61824a/tests/approved/navigation-timing/html
So if you find the place where we run in an object, you can check the
patch that added it for a rationale.
-Tony
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 11:13:42 UTC