- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:56:22 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, Ricardo Oliveira <rvelosoo@gmail.com>, public-web-perf@w3.org
On 11/16/2011 12:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/16/11 10:33 PM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: >> The Firefox implementation is passing 24% of the conformance tests at >> present > > For a lot of these, that's just because the tests are run inside an > <object>... We'll fix that, obviously, but that's not likely to be > affecting actual pages. Just curious, why are the tests running inside <object>? AFAIK using <object> for html pages isn't that common. Testing <iframe> would be more important (I'm not saying testing <object> isn't important). > >> There are two things which I think would be helpful: >> 1. Verify whether we have a conformance test that covers this. I think >> we do not. Perhaps we could write one by inserting a large fixed delay >> in the beforeunload and unload handlers, navigating to a new page, and >> ensuring that the unload delay was counted but not the beforeunload. >> 2. Verify bugs are filed at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ for test >> failures (or file new ones). > > Yep, indeed. > > -Boris > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 10:57:12 UTC