- From: Jason Duell <jduell@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:56:26 -0700
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@gmail.com>
- CC: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
(Pardon me if this is a resend) I'm also a bit confused by which/when timings should be set in the case of a cache hit from the regular HTTP cache. The spec notes that "Checking and retrieving contents from the HTTP cache [RFC 2616] is part of the fetching process. It's covered by the requestStart, responseStart and responseEnd attributes." Looking at steps 8-15 in the processing model for an HTTP cache hit: - step 9: at least for Mozilla, no DNS lookup is required to look for a cache hit, so goto step 11 - step 11: makes it sound like we should be recording connectionStart/End for a cache hit, which doesn't make much sense? - step 13: I assume we set 'requestStart' just before we start looking at the HTTP cache? - step 14/15: seem to map sensibly onto first/last bytes of reply serviced from cache. I'd propose we drop the connectionStart/End timing for cache hits, and generally make the language clearer about what happens in the processing model in the cache hit case. Jason Duell Mozilla On 05/19/2011 05:37 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Christian Biesinger > <cbiesinger@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed a bug in the description for requestStart (Thanks jduell): >>> This attribute must return the time immediately before the user agent starts requesting the current document. It is set prior to checking HTTP cache. >> From what I remember from the discussions and from the timeline below, >> the "HTTP cache" sentence should be removed here, because this >> attribute refers to the time immediately before the UA starts >> write()ing to the socket. Otherwise, this would be identical to >> fetchStart (which does have similar cache wording). > Also, can we clarify what "local ressources" are? Probably things like file:///? > > -christian
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 06:56:39 UTC