Re: [NavigationTiming] Redirect test cases

With the exception of the change you noted below, the new tests both
look good to me.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com> wrote:
> We noticed that for the cross-server redirection test case, we're
> incorrectly testing that redirectCount should be 1:
>
>
> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_xserver_redirect.htm
>
>
>
> Per the spec, it should be 0 for cross-origin redirects.
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/NavigationTiming/Overview.html#nt-navigation-info-redirect-count
>
>
>
> We will update the test.
>
>
>
> - Nic
>
>
>
> From: public-web-perf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-perf-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Nic Jansma
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: public-web-perf@w3.org
> Subject: [NavigationTiming] Redirect test cases
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> We've submitted two new test cases for NavigationTiming.  These tests look
> at the behavior of redirectCount, redirectStart and redirectEnd for
> navigations that contain a server-side redirect (via an IFRAME).
>
>
>
> This test looks at same-origin redirected navigations:
>
> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_server_redirect.htm
>
>
>
> This test looks at cross-origin redirected navigations:
>
> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_xserver_redirect.htm
>
>
>
> Both tests utilize a redirect.php, which is a modified version from the
> XMLHttpRequest/resources/ directory.  We figured it would be better to
> include a version in our own resources/ directory than depend on a
> non-shared resources directory under webapps/.
>
>
>
> The tests need to be started from w3c-test.org for the cross-origin
> navigation case, as it redirects initially to www.w3c-test.org.  Is there a
> good way to enforce this requirement?
>
>
>
> We just submitted these today so we are asking for feedback over the next
> week to be able to be discussed at the 4/6 conference call.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> - Nic

Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:06:23 UTC