- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:05:58 -0400
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:23 +1300, Cameron McCormack wrote: > For proceeding with the Animation Request Frame specification itself, I > suggest we start by looking at what Mozilla and WebKit have implemented, > and the differences between my and James’ version of the spec. It would > be good to get a version of the spec into CVS/hg, too. I created a stub for you in hg: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/AnimationRequestFrame/Overview.html You should be able to edit it. It's a stub, so feel free to change it as you see fit. Lots of folks are happy when using ReSpec.js [1] lately, so you might want to consider using it. Philippe [1] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 16:06:06 UTC