- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:23:13 +1300
- To: Anderson Quach <Anderson.Quach@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-web-perf@w3.org
Anderson Quach: > I'll add to the agenda a discussion on how we should proceed with > talking about topics related to making more efficient painting to the > agenda for tomorrow morning's call. Please accept my regrets. I’ll read the minutes tomorrow morning. In terms of future telcon scheduling, the only constraints I have are for it to be at a not too unreasonable time in UTC+12 (which NZ will switch back to in a few weeks). (SVG and FX are the only other calls I would clash with, and they haven’t yet rescheduled for post-DST changes.) For proceeding with the Animation Request Frame specification itself, I suggest we start by looking at what Mozilla and WebKit have implemented, and the differences between my and James’ version of the spec. It would be good to get a version of the spec into CVS/hg, too. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 04:23:57 UTC