RE: [NavigationTiming] requestEnd and reconciliation with server-side measurements

Thank you for adding the clarification.

 

---Rotan.

 

From: Zhiheng Wang [mailto:zhihengw@google.com] 
Sent: 08 February 2011 19:33
To: Philippe Le Hegaret
Cc: Rotan Hanrahan; public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: Re: [NavigationTiming] requestEnd and reconciliation with
server-side measurements

 

   Yes, the current draft
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/NavigationTiming/Over
view.html>  has a note in the requestStart section to explain the
decision of not including requestEnd.

Could you please help update the published version?

 

thanks,

Zhiheng

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:47 -0800, Zhiheng Wang wrote:
> Hi, Rotan,
>
>
>     You have summarized it well! Most of the points you brought up
> indeed contribute to the decision of dropping requestEnd.
> And, feedback we received suggests that the cost of finding out a
> sensible requestEnd in certain browser might be high, due to
> the encapsulation.
>
>
>     I will seek to give this better documentation in the draft.

Hi Zhiheng,

Did you make any actual change to the spec following this?

Philippe