- From: Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:25:28 +0000
- To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
- CC: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F677C405AAD11B45963EEAE5202813BD19CF8633@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntde>
Yes, we will hold off on this until we've settled on the navigationStart issues and we've added the domain validation.
- Nic
From: Tony Gentilcore [mailto:tonyg@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:10 PM
To: Nic Jansma
Cc: Zhiheng Wang; James Simonsen; public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
This validates that navigationStart is 0 after a cross-origin redirect. Should we hold off on approving until we figure out that issue?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com<mailto:Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Yep, Karen is preparing some updates to validate the starting domain.
- Nic
From: Zhiheng Wang [mailto:zhihengw@google.com<mailto:zhihengw@google.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 12:00 PM
To: James Simonsen
Cc: Nic Jansma; public-web-perf@w3.org<mailto:public-web-perf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
The X-origin redirect test<http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_xserver_redirect.htm> works fine on http://w3c-test.org but not http://www.w3c-test.org since
the iframe destination is set to w3c-test.org<http://w3c-test.org>. Shall we check the root document host name and set
it in the redirect?
cheers,
Zhiheng
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org<mailto:simonjam@chromium.org>> wrote:
The new tests look good to me. Thanks!
James
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com<mailto:Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Great catch! I updated test_timing_greater_than() to actually only test >, which is what we want. We don't have anything actually testing >=.
- Nic
From: simonjam@google.com<mailto:simonjam@google.com> [mailto:simonjam@google.com<mailto:simonjam@google.com>] On Behalf Of James Simonsen
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:12 AM
To: Nic Jansma
Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org<mailto:public-web-perf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com<mailto:Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>> wrote:
http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_server_redirect.htm
test_timing_greater_than('navigationStart', 0);
Despite its name, this is actually testing >=, so we're in the same boat if navigationStart is 0. I'd suggest renaming the helper function too, to better reflect what it's doing.
James
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 21:25:59 UTC