Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27

The new tests look good to me. Thanks!

James

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  Great catch!  I updated test_timing_greater_than() to actually only test
> >, which is what we want.  We don't have anything actually testing >=.
>
>
>
> - Nic
>
>
>
> *From:* simonjam@google.com [mailto:simonjam@google.com] *On Behalf Of *James
> Simonsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:12 AM
> *To:* Nic Jansma
> *Cc:* public-web-perf@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_server_redirect.htm
>
>
>
> test_timing_greater_than('navigationStart', 0);
>
>
>
> Despite its name, this is actually testing >=, so we're in the same boat if
> navigationStart is 0. I'd suggest renaming the helper function too, to
> better reflect what it's doing.
>
>
>
> James
>