W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > April 2011

RE: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27

From: Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:22:23 +0000
To: James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>
CC: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F677C405AAD11B45963EEAE5202813BD19CF797B@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Great catch!  I updated test_timing_greater_than() to actually only test >, which is what we want.  We don't have anything actually testing >=.

- Nic

From: simonjam@google.com [mailto:simonjam@google.com] On Behalf Of James Simonsen
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:12 AM
To: Nic Jansma
Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com<mailto:Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>> wrote:
http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_server_redirect.htm

test_timing_greater_than('navigationStart', 0);

Despite its name, this is actually testing >=, so we're in the same boat if navigationStart is 0. I'd suggest renaming the helper function too, to better reflect what it's doing.

James
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:22:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:01:07 UTC