RE: Web Performance Charter is out for review by W3C Members

Hi Anderson,

we could certainly be more explicit in the charter and list two
deliverables, if others believe it makes sense. However, we could also
leave the charter as-is and discuss the case separately. The charter
doesn't intend to restrict how the technical work is going to be
organized among documents.

Philippe

On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:05 +0000, Anderson Quach wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Here's my feedback on the current set of deliverables as defined on the Proposed Web Performance Working Group Charter [1]. The recommendation is to split out the single WebTiming deliverable into two deliverables, one that focuses on NavigationTiming and the second deliverable on ResourceTiming respectively. 
> 
> Currently, the folks contributing on the WebTiming working draft, mostly have consensus on the naming and definition of the timing marks as specified in the NavigationTiming section. And we are nearing a point where we will have two independent implementations of the NavigationTiming interface. Thus the NavigationTiming interface is further along in terms of maturity than ResourceTiming. 
> 
> The deliverable NavigationTiming is an interface for web applications to access timing information related to the navigation of the root document. This will include the standardized naming and definition of timing marks in relation to network latency and timing related to loading the root document in the user agent.
> 
> The deliverable ResourceTiming is an interface for web applications to access timing information related to an element as specified from the root document that is loaded in the user agent. This is timing information associated with loading of the following elements: iframe, img, script, object, embed, and link.
> 
> These two specifications complement each other in terms in the area of assessing and understanding performance characteristics. Having two deliverables will help stabilize the NavigationTiming specification and flush out the details within the ResourceTiming deliverable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Anderson Quach
> IE Program Manager
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/webperf
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-web-perf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-perf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 9:43 AM
> To: public-web-perf
> Subject: Web Performance Charter is out for review by W3C Members
> 
> Folks,
> 
> the charter is now out for formal review by the W3C Members until August 6, 2010. Feedback on it is still welcome here but be aware that I won't modify the draft in place while the review is ongoing. I did make some edits before sending it, following internal feedback. Some edits were, I believe, editorials. If some of those raise concerns, please let me know.
> 
> For those of you who are employed by a W3C Member, please ask your AC Rep to respond to the review at:
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2010JulSep/0001.html
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 19:46:45 UTC