Re: adding video and audio performance in charter

Hey, Philippe,

    To make sure I understand, are you proposing adding Audio/Video
performance
studies to the WebPerf WG or the WebTiming draft? Adding it to WebPerf (as a
separated
deliverable) makes perfect sense to me.

   Depending on Mike's studies, audio/video performance benchmarking can get
wild and
beyond the scope of timing, so I am not sure if we want to attach it to
WebTiming. Doing
that will likely delay the standardization of the the draft as well.

   Out of curiosity, any pointer to Mike's study?

cheers,
Zhiheng

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> Mike Smith pointed out to me that there might interest in doing
> performance evaluation of audio and video. I thought this was a good
> idea and should be explicit that this is on the table as well, even
> though we don't necessarily need to address it in the first version.
>
> I added a few words in the charter:
> [[
> WebTiming
>        This specification defines an interface for web applications to
>        access timing information related to navigation and elements,
>        including video and audio performance.
> ]]
>
>
> Let me know if you don't think those words should be there,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>